91香蕉国产在线观看软件I国产成人精品亚洲aI国产片免费在线观看视频I免费开视频I精品亚洲免费I欧美性另类I免费观看黄色12片一级视频I99re8这里有精品热视频免费I亚洲a成人vI99热免费在线

六級閱讀理解試題訓(xùn)練

時(shí)間:2021-06-11 08:11:07 試題

六級閱讀理解試題訓(xùn)練

  Passage Three

六級閱讀理解試題訓(xùn)練

  Questions 31 to 35 are based on the following passage.

  About the time that schools and others quite reasonably became interested in seeing to it that all children, whatever their background, were fairly treated, intelligence testing became unpopular.

  Some thought it was unfair to minority children. Through the past few decades such testing has gone out of fashion and many communities have indeed forbidden it.

  However, paradoxically, just recently a group of black parents filed a lawsuit in California claiming that the states ban on IQ testing discriminates against their children by denying them the opportunity to take the test. The judge, therefore, reversed, at least partially, his original decision.

  And so the argument goes on and on. Does it benefit or harm children from minority groups to have their intelligence tested? We have always been on the side of permitting, even facilitating, such testing. If a child of any color or group is doing poorly in school it seems to us very important to know whether it is because he or she is of low intelligence, or whether some other factor is the cause.

  What school and family can do to improve poor performance is influenced by its cause. It is not discriminative to evaluate either a childs physical condition or his intellectual level.

  Unfortunately, intellectual level seems to be a sensitive subject, and what the law allows us to do varies from time to time. The same fluctuation back and forth occurs in areas other than intelligence. Thirty years or so ago, for instance, white families were encouraged to adopt black children. It was considered discriminative not to do so.

【六級閱讀理解試題訓(xùn)練】相關(guān)文章:

閱讀理解試題精選06-12

語文閱讀理解試題精選06-11

海鳥閱讀理解試題06-12

宋史閱讀理解試題06-12

喝茶閱讀理解試題06-12

土閱讀理解試題06-12

關(guān)于閱讀理解試題精選06-12

語文閱讀理解試題04-03

課外閱讀理解訓(xùn)練03-19